Godfrey Osagiede · Lab Notes raw receipts: github.com/godfreystorm/ratchet-lab
Ratchet Lab · Experiment Log

Lab Notes

A homemade AI evolution lab, one week, honest nulls included.

A hand-drawn technical schematic of the 20x20 battle arena grid in amber ink on black, showing two bots' positions linked by a dotted line-of-sight ray past two hatched obstacle blocks, with a small 'Lab Notes' title card in the corner.

I built a small arena where simple bots fight each other, and let an LLM rewrite the losers into new bots, generation after generation. The question I actually wanted answered wasn't "can I make a bot win" — it was whether a colony of AI agents can accumulate real, shared knowledge over time, the way human culture does, instead of just getting reshuffled by a smarter model. I ran eleven experiments to find out, the first eight of them in one week. Some of them worked. Two of them are null results I'm keeping in the record on purpose, because the honest version of this story is more interesting than the flattering one. Numbers below are exactly what the runs produced — no rounding up. Full source and every raw run artifact are on GitHub.

How the runs are evaluated

Every claim on this page comes out of the same harness, and the harness is the part I'd defend in a code review. Runs are pre-registered: the arms, the metric and the stopping point are written down before the first generation, because an early trial of mine turned out to be statistically empty and I had already started reading a story into it. Comparisons go through a Fisher significance gate, so a null stays a null. Every run ships its own receipts in the repo — the SQLite archive, the lessons ledger, the spend bill, the metrics stream and full match replays — and nothing is cleaned up after the fact.

That discipline is what produced the most useful result here: a three-arm ablation where the no-library control beat the shared-library arm, which is the opposite of what the project was built to show. Two earlier claims of mine are retracted in the record below. If you are reading this to work out whether I can measure an AI system rather than just ship one, those two facts are the ones that answer it.

Article 0 · The flagship

The Week I Built an Evolution Lab

The full story: the bet, the arena, the tool libraries, the false law the colony obeyed into deaths, the trial that caught it, and the scoreboard at the end. A false map, two repealed laws, and a control that out-covered science.

Run 0

Dry Prototype

The whole loop — arena, archive, sandbox, replay, report — proven end to end before spending a cent. Two bugs found by watching raw replays instead of trusting the summary.

$0 spent~210 gens2 bugs caught
Run 1

First Haiku Run

Swap the mock mutator for a real model. Coverage jumps, inherited tools get called a quarter-million times — and a tempting but unproven story starts to form.

77.8% coverage11 tools
Run 2

Three-Arm Ablation

The control I should have run first. Verdict: the tool library did nothing measurable. A null result, owned in public.

Null result
Run 3

Bold Mutator on Groq

A bolder prompt makes tool adoption explode — 726,000 inherited-tool calls — but bold mutations of complex bots start crashing at runtime. The complexity death spiral.

726K tool callschampion collapsed
Run 4

Error Feedback

Feed a bot's own crash back into the next mutation prompt. The death spiral is cured — and the run nearly beats every other arm on both axes at once.

66.7% coverage1066 Elo
Run 5

Lessons Library

Distilled crash-lessons get injected into every prompt — untested. One lesson is flat wrong, and the colony obeys it into new deaths. Unfiltered culture breeds superstition.

Failed — instructively
Run 6

Living Playbooks

Lessons must survive an A/B trial before they're canonized, and can be retired later. A real superstition gets caught and rejected — on camera.

-34% crashes1 law kept
Run 7

The Long Game

300 generations, no new mechanisms — just time. All-time records fall. Then the final scoreboard delivers the series' honest closing line.

94.4% control coverage1099 science A Elo2 laws repealed
Run 8

The Trial Goes On Trial

The instrument gets audited. Every law the colony ever canonized fails a real significance test, a control with no descent ties the coverage record, and a properly gated 300-gen colony canonizes nothing at all.

0 of 16 doctrines survive94.4% cold coverage1133 Elo record
Run 9

What the Colony Threw Away

Analysis locked before the data existed. Across 14 colonies the lessons work — and the colony's own gate correctly rejected almost every one of them.

-5.9 pts crash ratep < 0.000113 of 14 colonies
Run 10

The Receiver Problem

The same lessons on a weaker model do nothing at all — a null tight enough to exclude Run 9's effect. The series ends on what that means for agent memory.

-0.3 pts no effectCI excludes Run 97 of 14 colonies

Raw receipts — every archive, lessons ledger, metrics file, and match replay: github.com/godfreystorm/ratchet-lab